{"id":5406,"date":"2024-05-08T15:15:34","date_gmt":"2024-05-08T18:15:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/?p=5406"},"modified":"2024-05-08T15:14:51","modified_gmt":"2024-05-08T18:14:51","slug":"repercussions-of-the-gates-foundations-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2024\/05\/08\/repercussions-of-the-gates-foundations-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"On preprints, journals, open access and research evaluation: the repercussions of the Gates Foundation’s decision"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Photograph<\/a>

Image: Jacklee<\/a>.<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

Original in Portuguese.<\/a><\/p>\n

Translation in Spanish by Ernesto Spinak.<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently announced that it will no longer fund APCs for open access journals and is prioritizing the adoption of preprints. A series of recent posts discusses how the Gates Foundation’s announcement has resonated with the scientific community, prompting considerations about open access and its forms of funding, peer review and ultimately, how these changes influence the evaluation and integrity of research. …<\/span> Read More →<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":5408,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[63,18,68,62,31,48,32,7],"class_list":["post-5406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis","tag-article-processing-charge-apc","tag-open-access","tag-open-science","tag-preprint","tag-research-evaluation","tag-research-funding-agency","tag-research-policy","tag-scholarly-communication"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t