{"id":5289,"date":"2023-10-18T12:00:45","date_gmt":"2023-10-18T15:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/?p=5289"},"modified":"2023-10-18T12:02:12","modified_gmt":"2023-10-18T15:02:12","slug":"executive-summary-scielo-25-years-meeting-open-science-with-ideia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2023\/10\/18\/executive-summary-scielo-25-years-meeting-open-science-with-ideia\/","title":{"rendered":"Executive summary: SciELO 25 Years Meeting &#8211; Open Science with IDEIA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/09\/header-25-en-1.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-5136 size-full\" title=\"SciELO 25 Years logo with the tagline: Open Science with IDEIA \u2013 Impact, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/09\/header-25-en-1.png\" alt=\"SciELO 25 Years logo with the tagline: Open Science with IDEIA \u2013 Impact, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility\" width=\"1000\" height=\"315\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/09\/header-25-en-1.png 1000w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/09\/header-25-en-1-300x95.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/09\/header-25-en-1-768x242.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>By Julio Zetter Pati\u00f1o<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Main Points of the SciELO Network Meeting<\/h3>\n<p>The SciELO Program celebrated its 25th year of regular operation during the week of September 25-29, 2023, which was divided into two parts: the SciELO Network Meeting and the SciELO 25 Years International Conference.<\/p>\n<p>Held every five years, the meeting reported and analyzed the progress of the 16 national collections of the SciELO Network, the methodological and technological updates of the SciELO Publishing Model, as well as the presentation and approval of the final version of the Priority Lines of Action for the next five years (2024-2028) with a focus on aligning journals, collections, and the SciELO Program with open science practices, discussed prior to the meeting.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/wp.scielo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Priority_lines.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Priority Lines of Action 2024-2028<\/a><u> <\/u>that have been agreed upon and which have an impact on the network are:<\/p>\n<p>1. Improving the governance of the SciELO Network as an open research communication infrastructure, enabling more active participation by the national collections that make it up.<\/p>\n<p>2. Publication of the Guidelines for the use of Artificial Intelligence tools and resources in research communication in the SciELO Network, which establishes standards and practices to be applied to authors, editors, and referees regarding the use of AI tools and resources in research communication in the SciELO Network collections.<\/p>\n<p>3. Improving the technological platform. Operational and aesthetic modernization of the national collections\u2019 websites.<\/p>\n<p>4. Form a united front on behalf of the entire network to express discomfort with external initiatives that promote the division of open access in Latin America.<\/p>\n<p>5. Establishment of the Office of Ethics and Good Practices in Scholarly Communication (SciELO Ethics).<\/p>\n<p>6. Statement on the use of Contributions to the Cost of Publishing (CCP) in the SciELO Network. Contributions to the Cost of Publishing (CCPs) are financial contributions that help cover the full or partial costs of publishing open access research under the CC-BY license. CCPs will replace the use of high article processing charges (APCs) generally charged by commercial publishers and scientific societies.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, the <a href=\"https:\/\/25.scielo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/Declaration-in-Support-of-Open-Science-with-IDEIA.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Declaration in Support of Open Science with IDEIA &#8211; Impact, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility<\/a> has been published, promoting the following topics:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Developing better access to scientific knowledge is essential for our collective future, not only to advance knowledge, but also to improve public policies and education, combat disinformation, protect our planet and create a basis from which research can contribute more actively to achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). UNESCO&#8217;s Open Science Recommendation, adopted by the governments of 193 countries in 2021, established an important international framework for Open Science policy and practice.<\/li>\n<li>Open science programs, such as SciELO, protect and promote diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility in both research and society.<\/li>\n<li>The sustainable, resilient, and pioneering work of the SciELO Network is an important scientific achievement for our countries and a valuable and globally recognized contribution to the progress of global Open Access to scientific knowledge in its various forms.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Points of interest addressed at the SciELO 25 Years Conference:<\/h3>\n<p>Participation of national and international scientific personalities, who widely recognized the trajectory and contributions of the SciELO program to promote the development and consolidation of Latin American science. Some of the representatives of initiatives, associations, agencies, universities, publishers, foundations, infrastructures, and councils who were present were:<\/p>\n<p>Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); Unit of Open Science and Research Infrastructures of the European Commission; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO); cOAlition S; <em>LA Referencia<\/em>; Crossref; <em>Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient\u00edficas y T\u00e9cnicas<\/em> (CONICET); SCImago Lab; <em>Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient\u00edficas<\/em> (CSIC); ASAPbio; \u00a0Research Data Alliance (RDA); Open Access Scholarly Publishing\u00a0Association (OASPA); Public Knowledge Project (PKP); <em>Associa\u00e7\u00e3o Brasileira de Editores\u00a0Cient\u00edficos<\/em> (ABEC Brasil); <em>Ag\u00eancia Bori<\/em>; <em>Instituto Brasileiro de Informa\u00e7\u00e3o em Ci\u00eancia e Tecnologia &#8211; Minist\u00e9rio da\u00a0Ci\u00eancia, Tecnologia e Inova\u00e7\u00e3o<\/em> (Ibict-MCTI); \u00a0<em>Associa\u00e7\u00e3o Brasileira de Editoras\u00a0Universit\u00e1rias<\/em> (ABEU); Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf); <em>Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia<\/em> (Portugal); <em>Funda\u00e7\u00e3o de Amparo \u00e0 Pesquisa do Estado de S\u00e3o Paulo<\/em> (FAPESP); <em>Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient\u00edfico e Tecnol\u00f3gico<\/em> (CNPq); <em>Coordena\u00e7\u00e3o de Aperfei\u00e7oamento de Pessoal de N\u00edvel Superior<\/em> (CAPES); <em>Espacio Iberoamericano del Conocimiento en la Secretar\u00eda General Iberoamericana<\/em> (SEGIB); Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (BIREME\/PAHO\/WHO); Committee on Data (CODATA); and GO FAIR Foundation.<\/p>\n<h3>Brazil&#8217;s scientific authorities<\/h3>\n<p>The initiatives that financially support the SciELO Network are FAPESP, CAPES, CNPq and FAPUnifesp.<br \/>\nNational and international authorities have generally strongly supported the following topics that Latin American scientific systems should aim for:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Incorporating the use, deposit, curation, and preservation of open data.<\/li>\n<li>Incorporating preprints into the publication flow of scientific research.<\/li>\n<li>Strengthening controls and promoting transparency in the management of production within the global scientific sector.<\/li>\n<li>Promoting closer links between the scientific community and the public to solve immediate social problems.<\/li>\n<li>Promoting the use of languages that take into account the important cultural diversity present in the scientific ecosystem at all levels.<\/li>\n<li>Promoting a change in scientific evaluation systems that better adapts to the practical approach of Open Science, combining and improving the contextualization of using both quantitative metrics and qualitative analyses.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Some additional points of interest were mentioned during the event:<\/p>\n<p>The Latin American publishing system has been recognized as one of the most sustainable and inclusive in the world, which is embodied in the definition of &#8220;diamond open access&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Transformative Agreements, as well as transitional ones, must be globally equitable and offer full price transparency.<\/p>\n<p>The retention of copyright by the collaborators (authors) who produce the research should be encouraged.<\/p>\n<h3>Goals towards the future<\/h3>\n<p>SciELO is positioned as one of the most important programs worldwide due to its ability to define clear and achievable goals to which Latin American science can adhere. On its 25th Anniversary, various stakeholders met and outlined several key points for the advancement of Open Science in Latin America. These included strengthening the governance of the SciELO Network and aligning it with open science practices, the use of Artificial Intelligence tools and resources in research communication and the creation of an Office of Ethics and Good Practices in Scholarly Communication. Moreover, access to scientific knowledge was promoted to combat disinformation and align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. During the SciELO 25 Years Conference, representatives of various national and international organizations supported SciELO&#8217;s trajectory and emphasized the need to strengthen transparency, open data management and the link between the scientific community and society. In short, SciELO continues to be a beacon for open science in Latin America, promoting key initiatives for its development and consolidation.<\/p>\n<h3>Full executive summary in PDF (Spanish only)<\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/b35957d240.imgdist.com\/public\/users\/Integrators\/BeeProAgency\/965042_949606\/Rese%C3%B1a%20SciELO%2025.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Rese\u00f1a ejecutiva: \u201cReuni\u00f3n SciELO 25 a\u00f1os\u201d &#8211; Ciencia Abierta con: Impacto, Diversidad, Equidad, Inclusi\u00f3n y Accesibilidad (IDEIA)<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>External links<\/h3>\n<p>Declaration in Support of Open Science with IDEIA: <a href=\"https:\/\/25.scielo.org\/en\/ideia-declaration\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/25.scielo.org\/en\/ideia-declaration\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Declaraci\u00f3n sobre el uso de Contribuciones al Costeo de Publicaciones (CCPs) en la Red SciELO: <a href=\"https:\/\/25.scielo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/4-Marilin-Declaracion-sobre-el-uso-de-Contribuciones-al-Costeo-de-Publicaciones-CCPs-en-la-Red-SciELO_es.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/25.scielo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/4-Marilin-Declaracion-sobre-el-uso-de-Contribuciones-al-Costeo-de-Publicaciones-CCPs-en-la-Red-SciELO_es.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Oficina de \u00c9tica y Buenas Pr\u00e1cticas en la Comunicaci\u00f3n de la Investigaci\u00f3n (SciELO \u00c9tica): <a href=\"https:\/\/25.scielo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/3-Edmundo-Establecimiento-de-la-Oficina-de-Etica-y-Buenas-Practicas.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/25.scielo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/3-Edmundo-Establecimiento-de-la-Oficina-de-Etica-y-Buenas-Practicas.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>SciELO 25 Years &#8211; Open Science with IDEIA: <a href=\"https:\/\/25.scielo.org\/en\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/25.scielo.org\/en\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>SciELO Network &#8211; Priority lines of action for professionalization, internationalization, and sustainability &#8211; 2024-2028: <a href=\"https:\/\/wp.scielo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Priority_lines.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/wp.scielo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Priority_lines.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Translated from the original in <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/es\/2023\/10\/18\/resena-ejecutiva-reunion-scielo-25-anos-ciencia-abierta-con-ideia\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Spanish<\/a> by Lilian Nassi-Cal\u00f2.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Various stakeholders met and outlined several key points for the advancement of Open Science in Latin America. These included strengthening the governance of the SciELO Network and aligning it with open science practices, the use of AI tools and resources in research communication and the creation of an Office of Ethics and Good Practices in Scholarly Communication. <span class=\"ellipsis\">&hellip;<\/span> <span class=\"more-link-wrap\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2023\/10\/18\/executive-summary-scielo-25-years-meeting-open-science-with-ideia\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span>Read More &rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":5134,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[85,68,7,82,8,9],"class_list":["post-5289","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-deia-principles","tag-open-science","tag-scholarly-communication","tag-scielo-25-years","tag-scielo-network","tag-scielo-program"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5289","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5289"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5289\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5293,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5289\/revisions\/5293"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5134"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5289"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5289"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5289"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}