{"id":5174,"date":"2023-03-07T16:40:24","date_gmt":"2023-03-07T19:40:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/?p=5174"},"modified":"2023-03-07T16:43:51","modified_gmt":"2023-03-07T19:43:51","slug":"shuffle-the-cards-and-deal-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2023\/03\/07\/shuffle-the-cards-and-deal-again\/","title":{"rendered":"Shuffle the cards and deal again"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

\"Photograph<\/a>

Image: \u611a\u6728\u6df7\u682a cdd20<\/a>.<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

Original in\u00a0Spanish.<\/a><\/p>\n

Translation in\u00a0Portuguese\u00a0by Lilian Nassi-Cal\u00f2.<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Research must be well planned, carried out correctly and reported in a clear and transparent way, as the reliability of the results depends on the rigor of the experimental design. However, in the published reports, there seems to be a lack of commitment by those responsible for assessing the quality of the research. Experts pointed out that the current incentive structures in research institutions do not sufficiently encourage researchers to invest in solidity and transparency, instead encouraging them to optimize their aptitude in the fight for publications and grants. Over the past decade, large-scale replication studies have shown that reproducibility is far from favorable in many scientific fields, and questionable research practices are becoming more prevalent. Clearly something is not working in the scientific enterprise. …<\/span> Read More →<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":5175,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[37,64,31,7],"class_list":["post-5174","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis","tag-ethics-in-scholarly-communication","tag-reproducibility","tag-research-evaluation","tag-scholarly-communication"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5174"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5174\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5180,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5174\/revisions\/5180"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5175"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}