{"id":4902,"date":"2022-01-28T10:40:35","date_gmt":"2022-01-28T13:40:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/?p=4902"},"modified":"2022-01-28T10:37:28","modified_gmt":"2022-01-28T13:37:28","slug":"how-the-rhetoric-of-excellence-influences-research-evaluation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2022\/01\/28\/how-the-rhetoric-of-excellence-influences-research-evaluation\/","title":{"rendered":"How the rhetoric of excellence influences research evaluation"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Lineart<\/a>

Image: sentavio<\/a>.<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

Original in Portuguese.<\/a><\/p>\n

Translation in Spanish by Ernesto Spinak.<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Academic institutions advertise their teaching and research programs associated with prominent positions in university rankings, or names that are synonymous with success, prestige, and reputation. This post reviews an article that shows how the \u201crhetoric of excellence\u201d is used in the academic world and favors the lack of reproducibility, fraud and the ineffective distribution of research grants and proposes strategies to overcome it. …<\/span> Read More →<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":4904,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[37,31,7],"class_list":["post-4902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis","tag-ethics-in-scholarly-communication","tag-research-evaluation","tag-scholarly-communication"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t