{"id":4614,"date":"2020-08-26T15:30:44","date_gmt":"2020-08-26T18:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/?p=4614"},"modified":"2020-08-26T15:38:19","modified_gmt":"2020-08-26T18:38:19","slug":"the-path-to-reproducibility-tests-is-through-registered-reports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2020\/08\/26\/the-path-to-reproducibility-tests-is-through-registered-reports\/","title":{"rendered":"The path to reproducibility tests is through Registered Reports"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

Image: Chromatograph<\/a>.<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

Original in Portuguese.<\/a><\/p>\n

Translation in Spanish by Ernesto Spinak.<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The need to reproduce research results for the sake of science transparency and credibility goes through numerous challenges. An article published in Nature indicates that, in order to obtain better results from reproducibility tests, it is important to establish protocols in agreement with the authors of the original study and to align expectations. Registered Reports, submitted to peer review before the experimental stage of the study, present themselves as a promising solution for successful reproducibility tests. …<\/span> Read More →<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":4619,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[68,64,31,7],"class_list":["post-4614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis","tag-open-science","tag-reproducibility","tag-research-evaluation","tag-scholarly-communication"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t