{"id":3432,"date":"2019-08-01T12:00:04","date_gmt":"2019-08-01T15:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/?p=3432"},"modified":"2019-08-01T12:08:21","modified_gmt":"2019-08-01T15:08:21","slug":"open-science-and-the-new-research-communication-modus-operandi-part-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2019\/08\/01\/open-science-and-the-new-research-communication-modus-operandi-part-i\/","title":{"rendered":"Open Science and the new research communication modus operandi \u2013 Part I"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>By Abel L Packer and Solange Santos<sup>1<\/sup><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/parte1_rbcs.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"180\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/parte1_rbcs-300x180.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3437\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/parte1_rbcs-300x180.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/parte1_rbcs-768x461.png 768w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/parte1_rbcs-150x90.png 150w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/parte1_rbcs.png 1000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption><em>Image adapted from the original, by <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/unsplash.com\/photos\/Skf7HxARcoc\" target=\"_blank\">Markus Spiske<\/a>.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Open Science calls for an essentially\nenriching considerable transformation of the traditional <em>modus operandi<\/em> of fostering, designing, conducting, and\nparticularly communicating research. The objective is to privilege the\ncollaborative nature of research and to democratize the access and use of\nscientific knowledge. It encompasses a set of practices, among which we\nhighlight: <\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>providing open access to data, analysis\nmethods, software codes, and other research materials, as well as the outcomes\nobtained to enable data preservation, reproducibility, and reusability;<\/li><li>fast communication of articles\nas a key factor to the advancement of scientific knowledge through the adoption\nof preprints, which is a complete version of the scientific article deposited\nby the authors in a public preprints server, before being submitted to a\njournal for publication. Preprints, thus, position themselves as the formal origin\nof the article publication flow and provide authors greater control over\ncommunication;<\/li><li>transparency and progressive\nopenness in the manuscript peer review processes involving relationships and\ninteractions between authors, editors and peer reviewers. <\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Although Open Science concepts have always\nbeen present during science evolution, the current movement is a product of the\nweb and, more precisely, of its ability to promote disintermediation in the\nprocesses of information access and communication and content interoperability.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The nature of Open Science<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The foundations, analysis and critical views of the concept and movements in favor of Open Science point out as a common axis the improvement of science functioning according to various dimensions, priorities or schools of thought. Particularly, the enrichment of the research communication <em>modus<\/em> <em>operandi<\/em> has as its main focus the improvement of the application of the scientific method in favor of the reliable generation of unprecedented knowledge, which translates into the conduction of informed and reproducible research, complying with ethical standards and favoring return of the investments. This return is a claim from research funding agencies wishing to foster the openness of research methods and data to be used in other studies, educational processes and objects, technological innovations, professional applications, continuous education, and other uses. In other words, the wide access to sources of knowledge involved and produced in the research process aims to maximize the <em>raison d&#8217;\u00eatre<\/em> of science as a cultural and social cooperative enterprise. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig1_en.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"833\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig1_en-1024x833.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3438\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig1_en-1024x833.png 1024w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig1_en-300x244.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig1_en-768x625.png 768w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig1_en-150x122.png 150w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig1_en.png 1034w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><figcaption><em>Source: FIOCRUZ, 2019, O que \u00e9 Ci\u00eancia Aberta?, available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2G8OwXc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2G8OwXc<\/a><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:center\"><strong>Figure 1. An umbrella encompassing independent practices has become the most popular among Open Science concept imagery. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, on the one hand, Open Science strengthens the networks of collaboration between researchers for the advancement of universal knowledge of disciplines and science in general. On the other hand, it promotes the social function of science in providing understandings and solutions to the major issues affecting the present and future of humanity, which are carefully systematized in the Declaration of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), launched in 2015 and approved by 193 countries, under the United Nations leadership, and known as 2030 Agenda (refer to Figure 2).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig2_en.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1513\" height=\"734\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig2_en.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3435\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig2_en.jpg 1513w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig2_en-300x146.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig2_en-768x373.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig2_en-1024x497.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig2_en-150x73.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1513px) 100vw, 1513px\" \/><\/a><figcaption><em>Source: ALEXOVICH, A. and SAMAAN, M., avaliable from: <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2tq3HV1\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2tq3HV1<\/a><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:center\"><strong>Figure 2. 2030 Agenda \u2013 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In many ways, the SDGs and Open Science are contemporary and global policies that converge in pursuit of better living conditions and environmental protection. This convergence is a key factor in global governance and in the interaction with its multiple regional, national, local and thematic contexts, highlighting the ability to influence public policies with the best available scientific evidence, empowering democratic and solidary society, including the identification and rejection of fake news and its destructive effects, as well as rejecting science-denying movements, some especially pernicious as refuting the effects of climate change, vaccine efficiency, and nonsenses like the flat Earth model. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The dissemination and discussion about the\nmeanings of Open Science, the challenges that its adoption imposes and,\nespecially, the advantages and gains it provides have grown in the\ninternational and national scientific scenario. It seems that the pace of\nadopting its practices will be expedited in the near future. This fact was\nrecorded in a recent survey on the implementation of Open Science in the\nEuropean Union and in eight other countries, prepared by Fiocruz and published\nas the green book<sup>2<\/sup>. There are also a growing number of information\nsources available on the web advocating the adoption of Open Science, such as\ntraining courses, websites, forums, etc. oriented to researchers and other\nactors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Brazilian government, in the context of the international partnership that helped create the 2011 Open Government Partnership (OGP) and its implementation agenda, launched in 2018 the 4<sup>th<\/sup> National Open Government Action Plan, consisting of eleven commitments. The third deals with Innovation and Open Government in science, more specifically with the &#8220;establishment of mechanisms for the governance of scientific data&#8221;, a commitment that, it&#8217;s worth remembering, is associated with SDG 9.5 for advancing research and technological capabilities. This commitment is structured in nine execution milestones, under the coordination of Embrapa and relies on the participation of federal Science and Technology bodies (Capes, CNEN, CNPq, Embrapa, Fiocruz and IBICT) and civil society actors, especially for the Brazilian Association of Scientific Editors (ABEC) and the SciELO\/Fapesp Program in the domain of scholarly communication (Figure 3).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig3.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"650\" height=\"198\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig3.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3434\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig3.png 650w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig3-300x91.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/08\/fig3-150x46.png 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px\" \/><\/a><figcaption><strong>Implementation milestones:<\/strong><br> 1.Implementing an interinstitutional network for Open Science<br> 2. Conducting national and international diagnosis of Open Science<br> 3. Defining guidelines and principles for institutional policies supporting Open Science<br> 4. Promoting raising awareness, participation and capacity building in Open Science<br> 5. Articulation with funding agencies to implement Open Science support actions<br> 6. Articulation with scientific editors to implement actions in support of Open Science<br> 7. Deploying pilot Federated Infrastructure for Research Data Repositories<br> 8. Proposing interoperability standards for Research Data Repositories<br> 9. Proposing a set of indicators for measuring Open Science maturity<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>At the SciELO Network meeting, which took\nplace during SciELO&#8217;s 20<sup>th<\/sup> Anniversary celebrations in September\n2018, the lines of action<sup>3<\/sup> for the next five years which include the\nprogressive adoption of Open Science communication practices were approved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Shared research<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The central aspect of the desired &#8220;open&#8221;\nscience qualification is the ability of communication permeating all processes\nand contents of the research cycle, which, it&#8217;s worth repeating, rescues and\npromotes the collaborative nature of the scientific enterprise in the creation\nof unprecedented knowledge. This broad and informed opening characterizes\nscientific knowledge as a global and inclusive public good, geographically,\nthematically, and socially. Openness\nimplies that the formulation and execution of research projects include careful\nand standardized registry of processes, methods, materials and data with a view\nto their public and readable availability, for both humans and computers.\nThis record ensures the integrity of the communication of outcomes. There are\nmore advanced cases where the process itself is opened, as in open lab\nnotebooks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Conceptually, making communication pervade\nthe entire research cycle is as or more important than the traditional and isolated\nfinal act of writing and communicating results through one or more journal\narticles. Besides ensuring the consistency of the entire research, allowing\nreuse and facilitating evaluations, making research data available \u2013 on trusted\npublic servers \u2013 ensures its preservation and avoids the tendency of\nprogressive data loss over the years, when kept by the researchers themselves\nor in non-sustainable environments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The ability to communicate across the entire\nresearch cycle translates into transparency and exposure while performing the\nresearch to automated, peer and public quality controls regarding methodological\nrigor and ethical standards. All of that contributes to minimizing errors and\nmisconduct such as plagiarism, conflicts of interest, falsified data, flawed\npeer review, and false authorship attribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Research data management and sharing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The practice of open data is formalized by data management as an integral part of projects, i.e., from the beginning to the end of the research cycle. It starts with a data management plan that integrates the project proposal in accordance with instructions from the funding agency or institution. An example is the website service of the University of California Curation Center &lt;<a href=\"https:\/\/dmptool.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\">https:\/\/dmptool.org\/<\/a>&gt; of the California Digital Library that guides the researcher in preparing data management plans according to different models.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Data management is a structuring function\nof the qualified execution of the research objectives investigation, the\nadopted methods, the findings, and its communication skills. It includes the\nprocesses of creation or collection, quality control, structuring, storage, and\nmaking the research data available, whether generated by the project itself or\nreused from other sources. Data management guides, methodologies, tools and\nservices almost always assume the use of digital media.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The objective is to plan, make feasible,\nand facilitate, on the one hand, the understanding and evaluation of the correct\nresearch execution, validation of the results and their reproducibility, and,\non the other hand, data sharing aiming at its reuse. Here the concept of data\nmay also include methodological tools and software codes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Since its publication in Scientific Data in\n2016, the &#8220;FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and\nStewardship&#8221;<sup>4<\/sup> has progressively merged as a consensus reference\nguide for the efficient organization and delivery of research data and server\nfunctionality. By FAIR we mean: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and\nReusable. The Global Open FAIR (GO FAIR) initiative comprises networks of\nimplementation of the FAIR principles with a view to the development of the\nInternet of FAIR Data &amp; Services (IFDS). Brazil started its participation\nwith <em>GO FAIR Brasil Sa\u00fade<\/em>, with the\nnetwork of implementation of FAIR principles in health sciences, under Fiocruz&#8217;s\nleadership.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In FAIR data management, researchers\ndeposit on a server a data set structured by three components following the\narchitecture of digital objects: a persistent identifier such as DOI (Digital\nObject Identifier), data, and metadata. Metadata is generally dependent on the\nsubject area and describes the data with standardized identification of\nauthorship, title, description, keywords, data elements, location, etc., making\nthem citable sources. Whenever appropriate, authors should write a data\narticle, providing data detailing, source, curation, and analysis possibilities\nand limitations of use, which is another citable source. Finally, they prepare\none or more textual research articles with data analysis, description, and results\ndiscussion. Thus, with open data, authors can broaden research communication\nchannels with at least three citable sources: data, data articles, and\nnarrative articles. Data is usually opened after publishing the articles. In\njustified cases of privacy preservation and need for temporary or definitive\nconfidentiality, the data is not open. In the context of Open Science, ethics\ncommittees will also be given guidance on what types of data should or should\nnot be open.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As research data management is highly\ndependent on disciplines and subject areas, scientific societies and graduate\nprogram associations are called upon to develop dissemination and training programs\nand guides for data management practices for their respective research\ncommunities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Internationally, journals are adopting in\ntheir editorial policies and manuscript evaluation criteria controls over\nresearch data, as well as software codes, and other materials that support the\nstatements and results obtained. A key control aspect is the citation standards\nthat generally follow the same citation structure as for scientific literature.\nData Cite is a reference organization for methodological data citation issues.\nIt also operates the R3Data catalog of research data repositories and it is a source\nfor journals to establish which repositories are acceptable. The journals also\nfeature the Center for Open Science (COS) Transparency and Openness Promotion\n(TOP) Guidelines as a guide for defining a path of gradual adoption of\nstructured data management across eight distinct criteria and three levels of\ndeployment. In Brazil, SciELO has adopted the TOP Guidelines in alignment with\nOpen Science. For all Brazilian journals, ABEC&#8217;s leadership in updating\neditorial policies will be decisive. Researchers who follow data management\nstandards are able to smoothly meet the journals\u2019 demands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Funding agencies now require data\nmanagement plan as part of the research project among the criteria for\nevaluating grant applications. FAPESP initiated this requirement in November\n2018, initially for the Thematic Projects. It is also currently promoting a\ndata management network involving S\u00e3o Paulo state&#8217;s seven public universities.\nSimilarly, the management of research data including the use of repositories\nhas now become part of universities and research institutions\u2019 research\npolicies. <\/p>\n\n\n<h3>Notes<\/h3>\n<p>1. This post was originally published in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sbcs.org.br\/?post_type=boletim\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Boletim Informativo da Sociedade Brasileira de Ci\u00eancia do Solo<\/a> and split into two parts for publication in the <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">SciELO in Perspective<\/a> blog. <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2019\/08\/01\/open-science-and-the-new-research-communication-modus-operandi-part-ii\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">See Part II here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>2. SANTOS, P.X., <em>et al<\/em>. Livro Verde \u2013 Ci\u00eancia Aberta e dados abertos: mapeamento e an\u00e1lise de pol\u00edticas, infraestruturas e estrat\u00e9gias em perspectiva nacional e internacional. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2017 [viewed 1 August 2019]. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.arca.fiocruz.br\/handle\/icict\/24117\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.arca.fiocruz.br\/handle\/icict\/24117<\/a><\/p>\n<p>3. SciELO \u2013 Linhas priorit\u00e1rias de a\u00e7\u00e3o 2019-2023 [online]. SciELO 20 Anos. 2018 [viewed 1 August 2019]. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scielo20.org\/redescielo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/09\/L\u00edneas-prioritaris-de-acci\u00f3n-2019-2023_pt.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.scielo20.org\/redescielo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/09\/L\u00edneas-prioritaris-de-acci\u00f3n-2019-2023_pt.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>4. WILKINSON, M. D., <em>et al<\/em>. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data [online]. 2016, vol. 1, no. 3 [viewed 1 August 2019]. DOI: <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sdata.2016.18\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">10.1038\/sdata.2016.18<\/a>. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/sdata201618\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/sdata201618<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>References<\/h3>\n<p>ALBAGLI, S., MACIEL, M.L. and ABDO, A.H. (org.). Ci\u00eancia Aberta, quest\u00f5es abertas. Bras\u00edlia: Ibict; Rio de Janeiro: Unirio, 2015 [viewed 1 August 2019]. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2o2b6c4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2o2b6c4<\/a><\/p>\n<p>BENEDIKT, F. and SASCHA, F. <em>Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought<\/em>. In: BENEDIKT, F. and SASCHA, F. (eds) Opening Science. Cham: Springer, 2014 [viewed 1 August 2019]. DOI: <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-00026-8_2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-00026-8_2<\/a><\/p>\n<p>MONS, B. Data Stewardship for Open Science: Implementing FAIR Principles. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2018. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2uVb47z\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2uVb47z<\/a><\/p>\n<p>PACKER, A.L. and SANTOS, S. Ci\u00eancia Aberta e o novo <em>modus operandi<\/em> de comunicar pesquisa. <em>Boletim Informativo da Sociedade Brasileira de Ci\u00eancia do Solo<\/em>. 2019, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 17-24 [viewed 1 August 2019]. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sbcs.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Boletim-SBCS-Volume-45-N%C3%BAmero-1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.sbcs.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Boletim-SBCS-Volume-45-N%C3%BAmero-1.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>SANTOS, P.X., <em>et al<\/em>. Livro Verde \u2013 Ci\u00eancia Aberta e dados abertos: mapeamento e an\u00e1lise de pol\u00edticas, infraestruturas e estrat\u00e9gias em perspectiva nacional e internacional. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2017 [viewed 1 August 2019]. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.arca.fiocruz.br\/handle\/icict\/24117\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.arca.fiocruz.br\/handle\/icict\/24117<\/a><\/p>\n<p>SciELO \u2013 Linhas priorit\u00e1rias de a\u00e7\u00e3o 2019-2023 [online]. SciELO 20 Anos. 2018 [viewed 1 August 2019]. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scielo20.org\/redescielo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/09\/L\u00edneas-prioritaris-de-acci\u00f3n-2019-2023_pt.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.scielo20.org\/redescielo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/09\/L\u00edneas-prioritaris-de-acci\u00f3n-2019-2023_pt.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>WILKINSON, M. D., <em>et al<\/em>. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. <em>Scientific Data<\/em> [online]. 2016, vol. 1, no. 3 [viewed 1 August 2019]. DOI: <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sdata.2016.18\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">10.1038\/sdata.2016.18<\/a>. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/sdata201618\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/sdata201618<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>External links<\/h3>\n<p>O que \u00e9 Ci\u00eancia Aberta? \u2013 Forma\u00e7\u00e3o Modular em Ci\u00eancia Aberta &lt;<a href=\"https:\/\/campusvirtual.fiocruz.br\/gestordecursos\/mod_hotsite\/ciencia-aberta\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/campusvirtual.fiocruz.br\/gestordecursos\/mod_hotsite\/ciencia-aberta<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p>Open Science MOOC &lt;<a href=\"https:\/\/opensciencemooc.eu\/about\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/opensciencemooc.eu\/about\/<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p>Research Data Alliance &lt;<a href=\"https:\/\/rd-alliance.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/rd-alliance.org\/<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p>The FOSTER Portal &lt;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fosteropenscience.eu\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.fosteropenscience.eu\/<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n\n\n<div style=\"height:58px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Translated from the original in <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/blog\/2019\/08\/01\/ciencia-aberta-e-o-novo-modus-operandi-de-comunicar-pesquisa-parte-i\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"Portuguese (opens in a new tab)\">Portuguese<\/a> by Lilian Nassi-Cal\u00f2.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The adopting process of open science <i>modus operandi<\/i> involves all phases, actors, and political and institutional research instances. In research projects, openness is organized and pervasive throughout the entire research cycle. This post provides an overview of the openness process, content, and research outcomes in light of the SciELO Program&#8217;s priority lines of action. It is divided into two parts.  <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2019\/08\/01\/open-science-and-the-new-research-communication-modus-operandi-part-ii\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">See Part II here<\/a>. <span class=\"ellipsis\">&hellip;<\/span> <span class=\"more-link-wrap\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2019\/08\/01\/open-science-and-the-new-research-communication-modus-operandi-part-i\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span>Read More &rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":3436,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[63,18,50,68,62,7,67],"class_list":["post-3432","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis","tag-article-processing-charge-apc","tag-open-access","tag-open-data","tag-open-science","tag-preprint","tag-scholarly-communication","tag-scielo-20-years"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3432","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3432"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3432\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3454,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3432\/revisions\/3454"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3436"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3432"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3432"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3432"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}