{"id":3322,"date":"2019-02-07T13:45:34","date_gmt":"2019-02-07T15:45:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/?p=3322"},"modified":"2019-02-07T13:47:20","modified_gmt":"2019-02-07T15:47:20","slug":"from-star-peer-reviewers-to-ghost-peer-reviewers-part-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2019\/02\/07\/from-star-peer-reviewers-to-ghost-peer-reviewers-part-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"From star peer reviewers to ghost peer reviewers \u2013 Part II"},"content":{"rendered":"

Part II: Bibliometrics of peer reviewers – a conjecture<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\"\"<\/a>

Image: macrovector<\/a>.<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

Original in Spanish.<\/a><\/p>\n

Translation in Portuguese by Lilian Nassi-Cal\u00f2.<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Open reviews and the emergence of platforms such as Publons, which publish these activities and integrate them into other academic tasks, open the possibility of the emergence of a new aspect of bibliometrics and certainly a new and prestigious market. …<\/span> Read More →<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":3326,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[29,27,69,53,7,61],"class_list":["post-3322","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis","tag-bibliometrics","tag-international-organization","tag-open-peer-review","tag-peer-review","tag-scholarly-communication","tag-the-future-of-peer-review"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t