{"id":1846,"date":"2015-06-08T15:14:50","date_gmt":"2015-06-08T18:14:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/?p=1846"},"modified":"2015-08-05T11:20:16","modified_gmt":"2015-08-05T14:20:16","slug":"scielo-updates-the-guide-for-publication-of-errata-and-retractions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2015\/06\/08\/scielo-updates-the-guide-for-publication-of-errata-and-retractions\/","title":{"rendered":"SciELO updates the guide for publication of errata and retractions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By Abel L Packer and Eliana Salgado<\/strong><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2417\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/erratum.png\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2417\" class=\"Foto adaptada da original: Carl Guderian. wp-image-2417 size-medium\" title=\"Adapted photo from the original: Carl Guderian.\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/erratum-300x190.png\" alt=\"Foto adaptada da original: Carl Guderian.\" width=\"300\" height=\"190\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2417\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Adapted photo from the original: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/bjacques\/3956867463\/in\/photolist-72DYQP-Jjmt4-4yfqzQ-6oMbaf-6PHYAn-6PHXcD-6PN6dS-5wt78f-b2ydZP-hQ11jK-6vXwv5-5SDNeF-8DTb5J-pTr1E-5sXtEk-9w6s3-72byAt-csbAxh-59JuaS-4eAwxg-24pZF-4DFCkZ-euLgJE-3JWAVo-7WbXr4-6WFa4a-81RMKs-6cuHoZ-8DTb5C-8SU1s2-4rjBFq-63aoD5-4rfvzi-B1YNh-832NAn-3bmmJ1-3bgQmp-75sEJj-48jHTz-4rjBd3-4rfvBF-4rjBvG-4rfvJn-5kn1D5-dHTa3P-6qp5Yt-6qp4x6-6qp5EZ-6qtdiq-72byFr\" target=\"_blank\">Carl Guderian<\/a>.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Articles and other types of documents published by journals may contain inaccuracies that have not been detected in the evaluation and editorial process and are revealed after publication. In these cases, the system of scientific communication standards and control mechanisms that ensures the correctness and completeness of the research and its communication has two main procedures for rectification according to the type, severity and implications of the incorrectness detected. The first is the publication of an <em>erratum<\/em> (or <em>corrigendum<\/em>), which recognizes one or more errors and corrects them, so that the document, corrected, remains active. The second is to publish a retraction, which recognizes one or more involuntary or intentional inaccuracies, such as the occurrence of plagiarism, use of inadequate methodology, presentation of manufactured, manipulated or irreproducible data or images, that invalidate the conclusions. Retraction almost always invalidates the article.<\/p>\n<p>Both procedures take place with the publication of a new document, classified as <em>erratum<\/em> or <em>retraction<\/em>, which registers the correction of the error or the reason for the article\u2019s retraction always referring to the original. This new document has its own identity and follows with the same indexing of the original article. In the case of errata, the original document is maintained and at the end of it, the correction is registered referring to the document that published the <em>erratum<\/em>. In case of retractions, the original document is replaced by a message stating that it has been retracted, referring to the retraction document.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, an article of a SciELO journal will have the following records in the event of an <em>erratum<\/em> or <em>retraction<\/em>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A new document is published immediately in the journal collection in the ahead of print mode or directly in the sequence of articles if the journal adopts the continuous publication mode. The ahead of print document will be incorporated in the next issue;<\/li>\n<li>In case of an <em>erratum<\/em>, the original document is maintained and at the end of the text it states that there was a correction and a link points to the <em>erratum<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li>In case of a retraction, the original document is replaced by a new text indicating that it has been retracted and a link points to the <em>retraction<\/em> document.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Every time the article is retrieved by a search the results will show two records, one that indicates that the article has been corrected or retracted and another on the article itself either in the corrected version or the retracted version.<\/p>\n<p>If additionally the article is indexed in other indexes, such as WoS and PubMed for example, this double register will be repeated in each index.<\/p>\n<p><em>Errata<\/em> and <em>retractions<\/em> are initiated by one or more authors of the article or by the journal editor. It is the editor\u2019s prerogative to inform SciELO and other indexes on the retraction. When there is suspicion about an article that may lead to its retraction, but the editor wishes to gather more evidence, an <em>expression of concern<\/em> may be published informing about the suspicion. The procedure for publishing an <em>expression of concern<\/em> is similar to that of an <em>erratum<\/em>, but the original article is still available containing the <em>expression of concern<\/em> information at the end of the text. If the suspicion is not confirmed and the retraction is not published, the <em>expression of concern<\/em> document and the information at the end of the original article are withdrawn from the journal.<\/p>\n<p>In late-May 2015 the SciELO Program published the updated guide to publishing <em>erratum<\/em>, <em>retraction<\/em> and <em>expression of concern<\/em>. The SciELO guide is based on guidelines and recommendations from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the National Library of Medicine (NLM).<\/p>\n<h3>References<\/h3>\n<p><em>COPE Code of Conduct<\/em>. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Available from: <a href=\"http:\/\/publicationethics.org\/files\/u2\/New_Code.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/publicationethics.org\/files\/u2\/New_Code.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"Z3988\" title=\"ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.jtitle=International+Committee+of+Medical+Journal+Editors+%28ICMJE%29&amp;rft_id=info%3A%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fresearchblogging.org&amp;rft.atitle=Corrections+and+Version+Control&amp;rft.issn=&amp;rft.date=2013&amp;rft.volume=&amp;rft.issue=&amp;rft.spage=&amp;rft.epage=&amp;rft.artnum=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.icmje.org%2Frecommendations%2Fbrowse%2Fpublishing-and-editorial-issues%2Fcorrections-and-version-control.html&amp;rft.au=International+Committee+of+Medical+Journal+Editors+%28ICMJE%29&amp;rfe_dat=bpr3.included=1;bpr3.tags=Research+%2F+Scholarship%2CEducation%2C+Ethics%2C+Funding%2C+Library+Science%2C+Policy%2C+Publishing%2C+Science+Communication%2C+Creative+Commons\"><em>Corrections and Version Control<\/em>. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Available from: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/recommendations\/browse\/publishing-and-editorial-issues\/corrections-and-version-control.html\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/recommendations\/browse\/publishing-and-editorial-issues\/corrections-and-version-control.html<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>Errata, Retractions, Partial Retractions, Corrected and Republished Articles, Duplicate Publications, Comments (including Author Replies), Updates, Patient Summaries, and Republished (Reprinted) Articles Policy for MEDLINE.<\/em> NIH U.S. National Library of Medicine. Available from: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nlm.nih.gov\/pubs\/factsheets\/errata.html\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.nlm.nih.gov\/pubs\/factsheets\/errata.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Guide for the registry and publication of errata, retractions and expressions of concern<\/em>. Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO). Available from: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scielo.org\/php\/level.php?lang=en&amp;component=42&amp;item=33\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.scielo.org\/php\/level.php?lang=en&amp;component=42&amp;item=33<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Retraction Guidelines<\/em>. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Available from: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publicationethics.org\/files\/retraction%20guidelines.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.publicationethics.org\/files\/retraction%20guidelines.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Scientific Misconduct, Expressions of Concern, and Retraction<\/em>. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Available from: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/recommendations\/browse\/publishing-and-editorial-issues\/scientific-misconduct-expressions-of-concern-and-retraction.html\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/recommendations\/browse\/publishing-and-editorial-issues\/scientific-misconduct-expressions-of-concern-and-retraction.html<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>External Links<\/h3>\n<p>COPE- Commitee on Publication Ethics &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/publicationethics.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/publicationethics.org\/<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p>ICMJE &#8211; International Committee of Medical Journal Editors &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p>NLM\/PUBMED &#8211; MEDLINE &#8211; National Library of Medicine &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nlm.nih.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.nlm.nih.gov\/<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In late-May 2015 the SciELO Program published the updated guide for publication of <i>erratum, retraction<\/i> and <i>expression of concern<\/i>. The guide was written based on international guidelines and recommendations and it is directed to editors of journals indexed in SciELO. <span class=\"ellipsis\">&hellip;<\/span> <span class=\"more-link-wrap\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/2015\/06\/08\/scielo-updates-the-guide-for-publication-of-errata-and-retractions\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span>Read More &rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":1847,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[47,2],"tags":[7,8],"class_list":["post-1846","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-methodology","category-news","tag-scholarly-communication","tag-scielo-network"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1846"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1846\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1928,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1846\/revisions\/1928"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1847"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}